|
Click here to begin the
Review Process |
|
Reviewer
FAQs |
|
|
Recommendations
|
| Nominate for Best Paper - This category means that
the paper should be accepted "as is" and the reviewer
considers the paper sufficiently outstanding to be
nominated for the Madnick best paper award for ICIQ 2007. |
| Accept As Is -
This category means that the paper should be accepted “as
is”, but although the Reviewer feels this is a very strong
paper, the Reviewer does not wish to nominate this paper
as a best paper for ICIQ 2007. |
| Accept with Minor
Revisions - This category means that the Reviewer
has some minor suggestions or recommended changes, but
that the paper is acceptable as a whole. |
| Accept Conditional Upon
Major Revisions – This category means that the
Reviewer has some major suggestions or recommended changes
that must be made before the Reviewer can consider this
paper acceptable for ICIQ 2007.
|
|
Reject
- This category means that the Reviewer feels that this
submission has serious problems that cannot be rectified. |
|
|
Review
Guidelines for Academic Papers (review
form)
|
|
The
paper will be evaluated using the following criteria:
- The
significance and potential contribution to research in the field.
- The
relevance to ICIQ.
- The
originality of the paper.
- The
strength of theoretical foundations and technical quality.
- The
quality of the presentation.
- The
likelihood
of drawing and keeping an audience.
- Overall
rating for the paper.
|
|
|
Review Guidelines for Practitioner Papers (review
form)
|
The
paper will be evaluated using the following criteria:
- The
significance and potential contribution to professionals
in the field.
-
The
relevance to ICIQ.
- The
originality of the paper.
- The
strength of theoretical arguments, experiential data, use
cases, analysis, or other
techniques that are utilized.
- The
quality of the presentation.
- The
likelihood
of drawing and keeping an audience.
- Overall
rating for the paper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
top |
